The Grapevine
RSS
  • Recent Posts

  • Calendar

    September 2010
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug «-»  
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
  • About

     
    Adam Dimech is a plant scientist and keen photographer from Melbourne, Australia. Read more here

     
    If you want to contact Adam Dimech, click here.

  • Madden approves Windsor redevelopment

    architecture, heritage, politics | Posted on March 18th, 2010 Add comments

    It is with deep sadness that I advise readers of The Grapevine that the Minister for Planning, Justin Madden, has approved the hideous Windsor Hotel redevelopment that I wrote about in October.

    After the fiasco surrounding a leaked government memo that revealed a plot to hold a “sham public consultation“, approval from the Minister already seemed like a fait accomplis. Then last Wednesday (16 March 2010), the Heritage Council of Victoria granted approval for the redevelopment plans, subject to various revisions. So it came as no surprise when the Minister made his announcement today.

    The following ABC News Victoria clip outlines the whole saga beautifully, including the Minister’s woeful performance at today’s press conference.

    I won’t outline my objections to this project again, as they’re already outlined in my previous blog post.

    I’ll just reiterate my disappointment at the vandalism that’s about to be wreaked upon the grand Windsor Hotel. I made the effort to write a lengthy submission to the Heritage Council, objecting to this proposal, but it seems it was in vain. Nevertheless, they have removed some of the “rough edges” from the design, which is of some value.

    To those in Melbourne, I say enjoy this view, one last time… because it won’t be there for much longer.

       

    6 Responses to “Madden approves Windsor redevelopment”

    1. Andrew says:

      Ripper photo on a bad day. Really, what is the point of height limits if they are not a limit?

    2. Daniel says:

      Psst.. the timestamp on the video is wrong :-)

    3. Adam Dimech says:

      Thanks, Daniel. The matter has been corrected.

    4. Daniel says:

      Next can you get the (magnificent) photos showing in Google Reader? :-)

    5. Donna says:

      Such a shame. It seems strange for the Heritage Council to reason that the redevelopment would be required in order to sustain the operation of the hotel. Would have thought the redevelopment would actually diminish the heritage value of the hotel.

    6. Joe Kinsela says:

      Adam, you are doing a wonderful work. There is no doubt the DCM designs for additional structures at The Windsor are striking, even lovely, but they will be in the wrong place. Where would the right place be? Dandenong, perhaps? Elsewhere certainly. The more exquisite they make the Bourke Street corner building, the more it will distract from Parliament and The Windsor itself. The present corner building sits perfectly well, being polite to its neighbours. Good manners is all we want.

    Leave a Reply

     

     

    Recent Comments...

    • isobel: A well composed and thoroughly researched article outlining ...
    • Andrew: Nice summary, but you did leave out the batts, which did Lab...
    • Adam Dimech: Simple and easy is what I was aiming for. I just looked u...
    • Andrew: I have not come across it, but it appears to be a great webs...
    • Brenda: I bought a Scarlet Blaze approx' 4-5 years ago. It split in ...